DIFFERENCES IN RESULTS OF LEARNING EVALUATION OF DELIVERY CARE USING OSCE AND NON-OSCE
Main Article Content
Abstract
The midwifery Diploma 3 education curriculum includes theoretical learning as well
as clinical skills that must be possessed to carry out proper midwifery practice.
Learning evaluation should cover all areas including clinical skills. Delivery care is
one of the main competencies that must be ensured by midwifery students. Poltekkes
Jakarta 3 Midwifery Department D3 Midwifery Study Program conducts evaluations
using various methods. Clinical skills evaluation methods can be through OSCE or
non-OSCE.
The purpose of this study was to find out the differences in the results of the
evaluation of clinical skills in delivery care by comparing the OSCE and non-OSCE
methods.
This research method uses descriptive analytic. The population in this study were
Level II students of the D3 Midwifery study program, totaling 80 students. The results
of this study indicate that the clinical skill passing rate of students using the OSCE
method is 97.5% higher than that of the non-OSCE method, which is 95%. The group
of students who used the OSCE evaluation method with a mean of 3.40 and the class
with the non-OSCE evaluation method was 3.13. Based on the results of the
Independent T Test Samples statistical test, the results obtained a significance of
0.001 (P value <0.005). These results indicate a significant difference between the
evaluation results of the OSCE method and the non-OSCE method on the clinical
skills of midwifery students in Midwifery Care for Maternity. The results of this study
are in accordance with several other research results which recommend the OSCE
method to be one of the evaluation methods in midwifery Diploma 3 education.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Practice : A Perspective.129 -130.
Al-dean, A. M. G., Lachine, O. A., Kamel, N.
F., Al, A., & Mohamed, N. H. (2019).
Students ’ Perception of Objective
Structured Clinical Evaluation ( OSCE )
versus Clinical Practical Evaluation (
CPE ) and their Achievement. 6(2), 1240–
1254
Clark, C. A. (2015). Evaluating Nurse
Practitioner Students Through
Objective Structured Clinical
Examination. Nursing Education
Perspectives, 53-54
IBI, AIPKIND. Draft Naskah Akademik
Sistem Pendidikan Kebidanan di
Indonesia. editors. Jakarta: HPEQ; 2012.
Krishnamurthy, K. & Subbarao, K.S.V.K.
Assessment , Evaluation and examinations
; Points to Ponder Introduction . 2015.
1(2): 60–68.
Latifah U, 2016. Perbedaan Hasil Belajar
Praktikum Asuhan Kehamilan dengan
Metode OSCE dan non OSCE untuk
mahasiswa. Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi
Kesehatan. 7 (2).
Tambunan T, Soetjiningsih, Supriyatno B.
Sistem Evaluasi pada Pendidikan Dokter
Berbasis Kompetensi. Jakarta: Kolegium
Ilmu Kesehatan Anak Indonesia. 2011
Al-dean, A. M. G., Lachine, O. A., Kamel, N.
F., Al, A., & Mohamed, N. H. (2019).
Students ’ Perception of Objective
Structured Clinical Evaluation ( OSCE )
versus Clinical Practical Evaluation (
CPE ) and their Achievement. 6(2),
1240–1254.
Dunger, C., & Schnell, M. W. (2022).
Implementing the Objective Structured
Clinical Examination (OSCE) in
postgraduate education in nursing
science—a pilot project to assess ethical
competences in nursing practice and
research. Ethik in Der Medizin, 34(3),
451–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00481-
022-00701-1
Zahra, M., Elindra, R., Oktaria, D., & Aries,
R. (2019). Hubungan Tingkat Kecemasan
terhadap Hasil Ujian OSCE pada
Mahasiswa Tingkat Pertama di Fakultas
Kedokteran Universitas Lampung
Relationship between Anxiety Levels
Een Nuraenah, Jujun Dwi Astuti, Syarifah
Differences In Results Of Learning Evaluation Of Delivery Care.....
Journal-aipkind.or.id 6
against OSCE Exam Results for First
Year Students at the Faculty of Medicine
, University of. Jurnal Kedokteran Unila,
9(1), 123–128